Executive Summary
The client is a Tier-1 US mobile network operator and one of the world's largest telcos. LTTS ran two programmes for them, both making the same move: replacing human reaction with engineered anticipation.
On the network, LTTS built an AI advisory decision-support system to move radio-access support from reactive to proactive: anomaly-detection models over 20 TB of live, historical, contextual and expert data, engineered against a target of flagging service-impacting failures more than 24 hours ahead. On the commercial side, LTTS automated the network-service testing that gates every wholesale brand launch, cutting regression cycles from hours and days to minutes.
Read the Full Case Study. Anytime, Anywhere
Download Case StudyThe Challenge
A national radio network fails constantly in small ways, and the operator finds out from its customers. Fault management is alarm-driven, and an alarm is a receipt: it confirms something already broke. Truck rolls follow. Tickets follow.
The same reactive posture ran through the wholesale business. Launching a new MVNO brand on the operator's network meant manual testing across every environment with several vendor teams in the chain. Long lead times, no service-uptime reporting, and customer-experience tickets as the first signal of degradation.
The operator wanted the same thing in both places: to know first
Engineering Complexity
Both problems are hard for reasons that do not show up in a demo.
An alarm is a receipt, not a warning.
The alarm channel is also noisy. One published analysis of a seven-day operator dataset of over 5.5 million alarms found roughly 49% were chattering alarms that filtering removed outright. Prediction has to come from performance data, not the alarm stream.
The worst failures raise no alarm at all.
The industry calls it a sleeping cell. A granted patent defines it as a cell outage that makes mobile services unavailable to subscribers while, from the network's point of view, the network still appears operable; no alarm reaches the operations centre. Finding it means reasoning over traffic patterns, not faults.
Almost nothing fails, which is the problem.
This is a severe class-imbalance problem. A peer-reviewed study of a real operator network of roughly 10,000 base stations, each with about a dozen replaceable components, found only a few hundred faulty components replaced per year. There is no rich labelled failure set to learn from, and the network keeps changing under the model.
A wholesale launch is a combinatorial test problem.
Every new brand means revalidating voice, SMS, MMS and data, plus policy behaviour such as throttling after a data allowance expires. That runs across environments, devices and OS versions, with third parties in the chain, each interface measured against TM Forum Open API and GSMA specifications.
Business Outcomes
What changed
Hours and days to minutes
Why it is credible
Device-based service tests and UI workflows run unattended across environments, instead of being executed by hand across several vendor teams.
What changed
45 to 50% less test design effort; 75% efficiency gain
Why it is credible
A reusable framework built to TM Forum and GSMA specifications means each new brand inherits a validated suite instead of authoring cases from scratch. Automation removes the wait states that dominate a manual cycle: environments, cross-team handoffs, manual result capture.
What changed
Post-validity throttling faults found
Why it is credible
A live customer-experience defect, found by a test suite rather than by a subscriber.
What changed
Reactive to proactive detection
Why it is credible
Continuous automated probing surfaces availability gaps before customers raise tickets. Previously there was no service-uptime reporting at all.
What changed
Design target: over 24 hours at 95% confidence
Why it is credible
The system was specified and built to that lead time, which is what turns maintenance from a dispatch queue into a schedule.
What changed
20 TB over one year, streaming
Why it is credible
Kafka ingestion into elastic containers, scoring live data alongside historical, contextual and expert inputs.
What changed
10 to 15% less downtime; 5 to 8% more productivity
Why it is credible
Modelled benchmarks from comparable predictive-maintenance programmes on rotating and legacy equipment. The mechanism is lead time: scheduled work costs less than an emergency.
Success Stories